Apparatus for guiding an autonomous vehicle towards a docking station

ABSTRACT

An apparatus for guiding an autonomous vehicle towards a docking station including an autonomous vehicle with a camera-based sensing system, a drive system for driving the autonomous vehicle, and a control system for controlling the drive system. The apparatus includes a docking station including a first fiducial marker and a second fiducial marker, wherein the second fiducial marker is positioned on the docking station to define a predetermined relative spacing with the first fiducial marker, wherein the control system is operable to receive an image provided by the camera-based sensing system, the image including a representation of the first and second fiducial markers, and to control the drive system so as to guide the autonomous vehicle towards the base station based on a difference between the representation of the first and second fiducial markers in the received image and the predetermined relative spacing between the first and second fiducial markers.

REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.14/890,414, filed Nov. 10, 2015, which is a national stage applicationunder 35 USC 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2014/051289,filed Apr. 25, 2014, which claims the priority of United KingdomApplication No. 1308450.4, filed May 10, 2013, the entire contents ofwhich are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a system in which a mobile robot may be guidedtowards, and to dock with, a docking station in order to achieve certainfunctions, for example, to replenish a rechargeable power source of themobile robot. The invention also relates to the docking station used insuch a system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is becoming commonplace for mobile robots to be used around the home.For example, there are mobile robots that are designed specifically forvacuum cleaning and also ones which are designed for floor mopping.Also, mobile robots may be used in the home as mobile sentries. Suchmobile sentries are equipped with suitable sensor suites to enable themto navigate a household, or office space, autonomously and detectabnormal conditions such as elevated heat levels or intruders into thearea.

Common to such mobile robots is the requirement for them to moveautonomously and so they are typically equipped with a rechargeablepower source in the form of a battery pack in order to decouple therobot from dependence on wall-mounted power sockets. Typically the robotwill be configured with an internal power monitoring routine so that ithas a level of self-awareness relating to the level of electrical powerthat remains. When power levels are low, the robot is able to make itsway back to a docking station with which the robot can connect in orderto replenish its battery pack.

Mobile robot docking stations principally are provided with anelectrical charging system having a set of contacts. The contacts areengageable with complementary contacts on the robot in order to providean electrical charging current to the robot. However, docking stationsmay also have the facility to provide radio signals, infra red guidingbeams or other emissions in order to assist the robot in locating thedocking station. However, with such complexity come drawbacks. Often,mobile docking stations are large bulky items which need to be placedclose to a power socket in a room of a home. Their physical presence hasa significant visual impact and this detracts from the overridingprinciple of mobile robots that they should minimize impact on the user.

It is with these issues in mind that the invention has been devised.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect the invention provides apparatus for guiding anautonomous vehicle towards a docking station comprising an autonomousvehicle provided with a camera-based sensing system, a drive system fordriving the autonomous vehicle, and a control system for controlling thedrive system. The apparatus further includes a docking station includinga first fiducial marker and a second fiducial marker, wherein the secondfiducial marker is positioned on the docking station to define apredetermined relative spacing with the first fiducial marker, whereinthe control system is operable to receive an image provided by thecamera-based sensing system, the image including a representation of thefirst and second fiducial markers, and to control the drive system so asto guide the autonomous vehicle towards the base station based on adifference between the representation of the first and second fiducialmarkers in the received image and the predetermined relative spacingbetween the first and second fiducial markers.

The invention is useful in the context of a wide variety of semi- orfully-autonomous guided vehicles, but has particular utility in thefield of domestic mobile robots. The invention provides acomputationally less intensive heuristic control scheme to guide avehicle towards a docking station based on the observed relative spacingbetween a pair of fiducial markers, which may also be referred to astargets.

The apparatus may be further operable to store data relating to thepredetermined relative spacing between the first fiducial marker and thesecond fiducial marker, search for and identify the first and secondfiducial markers in the image, evaluate the relative position of thefirst and second fiducial markers in the image, compare the evaluatedrelative position of the first and second fiducial markers to thepredetermined relative position of the first and second fiducialmarkers, and control the drive system in dependence on the comparison inorder to guide the autonomous vehicle towards the base station.

In one embodiment, in order to obtain information relating to thedistance between the vehicle and the docking station, the control systemis operable to compare the relative distance between first fiducialmarker and the second fiducial marker. Preferably, the control systemidentifies a centre point of each of the fiducial markers in order tomake the comparison and calculates the pixel separation of the centrepoints of each of the fiducial markers as they appear in the capturedimage.

In order to obtain information regarding the lateral alignment of thevehicle to the docking station, the control system may compare thehorizontal alignment between the first and second fiducial markers inthe image. This may involve calculating the pixel distance heights ofeach of the first and second fiducial markers, comparing the differencebetween the two calculated pixel distance heights, and inferringguidance information based on the comparison.

Since the apparatus comprises an autonomous vehicle that is dockablewith a docking station, the invention also resides in a docking stationcomprising a main body having a first fiducial marker and a secondfiducial marker spaced a predetermined distance from the first fiducialmarker.

Preferably, the first and second fiducial markers are located on adisplay portion of a docking station that is in a substantially uprightposition when the docking station is placed on a floor surface.Preferably, the display portion of the docking station is planar so asto provide a flat surface on which the markers may be displayedprominently and clearly which aids the camera-based sensing system inimaging the markers. In one embodiment, the display portion is pivotablewith respect to a base portion of the docking station. This enables thedocking station to be low profile in form.

In principle the fiducial markers may take many forms, simple orcomplex. However, although complex fiducial markers can convey muchinformation, they are less robust to being captured accurately by acamera-based imaging system. In one embodiment, the fiducial markersdefine a pattern being in the form of a grid comprising four squares ina two-by-two arrangement. Preferably, alternate squares in the grid arecontrasting colours, particularly black and white, to maximise theability of the system to identify the markers in an image frame. Otheroptions for the form of fiducial markers are circle-based and otherpolygonal-based markers, but the square patterned markers are currentlyas they can readily be identified by suitable feature detectionalgorithms.

Although the camera-based sensing system of the autonomous vehicle maycomprise a monocular camera, in one embodiment the camera-based sensingsystem includes an omnidirectional camera such that a 360 degree sceneimage can be captured in a single frame.

The invention also resides in a method of controlling an autonomousvehicle to guide the vehicle towards a docking station, the dockingstation including a first fiducial marker and a second fiducial marker,wherein the second fiducial marker is positioned on the docking stationto define a predetermined relative spacing with the first fiducialmarker, the method comprising capturing an image including the dockingstation, controlling a drive system of the autonomous vehicle so as toguide the autonomous vehicle towards the base station based on adifference between the representation of the first and second fiducialmarkers in the received image and the predetermined relative spacingbetween the first and second fiducial markers.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order that the invention may be more readily understood, embodimentswill now be described by way of example only with reference to theaccompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a room in which is located an exemplaryrobotic system comprising a mobile robot and a docking station inaccordance with the invention;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the robot in FIG. 1 in more detail;

FIG. 3 is a system diagram of the electronic control system of themobile robot;

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the navigation sensor of the robot;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the docking station shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is diagram illustrating a functional principle of the a dockingcontrol module of the robotic system;

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a further functional principle of thedocking control system of the robotic system;

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram representing a docking control routineimplemented in the robot; and

FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates a manoeuvring of the robot duringthe docking control routine of FIG. 8.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

With reference to FIG. 1 a robotic system 2 includes a mobile robot 4and an associated docking station 6. In this embodiment, the mobilerobot 4 is shown in the context of a vacuum cleaning robot although itshould be appreciated that this is not essential to the invention andthat the invention is applicable to any mobile robot, in a domesticsetting or otherwise. The mobile robot 4 is autonomous and includessufficient processing and sensing capability that enables the robot tonavigate around the room, with the aid of a suitable on board navigationsystem, cleaning the floor as it goes.

The mobile robot 4 is powered by a rechargeable power source in the formof an internal battery pack (not shown in FIG. 1). Such a battery packis generally known in the art and comprises a plurality of cells of avariety of cell chemistries. Cell chemistries in the lithium-ion familyare currently preferred due to their high power density, low charge lossand lack of memory effect, although other cell chemistries such asnickel metal hydride and nickel cadmium are also acceptable.

The robot 4 is dockable with the docking station 6 so that it is able torecharge the battery pack when it nears a depleted state. The way inwhich the robot 4 moves to dock with the docking station 6 will bedescribed in more detail later.

The docking station 6 is shown in FIG. 1 positioned against a wall ofthe room. The docking station 6 includes electrical contact means in theform of a pair of elongate electrical contacts 8 by which means thedocking station 6 is able to provide charging energy to the robot 4 onceit is in a docked position. The docking station 6 is attached to a mainselectrical wall outlet 10 via a power supply 12 and cable 14 and, inthis way, a source of power is provided to the electrical contacts 8 ofthe docking station 6.

The robot 4 is shown in more detail in FIG. 2. Here, the robot 4 has agenerally circular main body 16 and a separating apparatus 18 that iscarried on a forward part of the body 16 and which protrudes through acomplementary shaped recess 20 of the main body 16.

For the purposes of this specification, the terms ‘front’ and ‘rear’ inthe context of the robot will be used in the sense of its forward andreverse directions during operation, with the separating apparatus 18being positioned at the front of the robot. Similarly, the terms ‘left’and ‘right’ will be used with reference to the direction of forwardmovement of the robot.

The main body 16 supports several components of the robot and ispreferably manufactured from a high-strength injection moulded plasticsmaterial, such as ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), although itcould also be made from appropriate metals such as aluminium or steel,or composite materials such a carbon fibre composite.

The robot 4 has a drive system which is operable to propel the robotabout its environment and includes a pair of traction units 22 mountedone on either side of the body. Only one traction unit 22 is shownpartially in FIG. 2, although it should be appreciated that the preciseform of traction unit is not central to the present invention. However,in this particular embodiment the traction units 22 are in the form ofelectrically driven caterpillar-track units having a continuousrubberized belt or track constrained around leading and trailing pulleywheels, although wheels could also be used as an alternative. Thetraction units 22 are located on opposite sides of the main body 16 andare operable independently to enable to robot 4 to be driven in forwardand reverse directions, to follow a curved path towards the left orright, or to turn on the spot in either direction depending on the speedand rotation direction of the wheels. Such an arrangement is common inmobile robot applications and so it will not be described in furtherdetail here.

In order to clean the floor surface the robot also includes a cleanerhead 24 that is supported on an underside of the main body 16 behind thetraction units 22. Although not shown in the Figure, the cleaner head 24includes a rotatable agitator that works to beat dirt from the floorsurface. A suitable vacuum generator in the form of a motor and fanunit, also not shown, is provided in communication with the cleaner head24 to draw dirt laden airflow into and through the cleaner head 24 andinto the separating apparatus 18. The precise configuration of thesecomponents is not essential to the inventive concept so further detailis omitted but it should be noted that components such as cleaner heads,agitators and separating apparatus are known in the context of roboticvacuum cleaners.

The underside of the main body 16 also includes electrical contact means(not shown) comprising first and second electrical contacts that aresupported on the underside of the robot body 16. Each of the first andsecond contacts are mounted in an aligned configuration and are operableto connect to the electrical contact means 8 on the docking station 6.

FIG. 3 shows schematically a control system 30 of the robot 4 and itsinterfaces with the components described above. The control system 30includes a controller 32 having appropriate control circuitry andprocessing functionality to process signals received from its varioussensors and to drive the robot 4 in a suitable manner. The controller 32is interfaced into a sensor suite 34 of the robot 4 by which means therobot 4 gathers information about its environment in order to map itsenvironment and perform a cleaning route. The sensor suite 34 is alsoshown generally in FIG. 1 and includes a navigational sensor 36 which,in this embodiment, is a camera-based system in the form of anomnidirectional camera for providing the robot 4 with a panoramic viewof its surroundings, and also a near-field proximity sensor array 38 toprovide the robot 4 with the capability to detect obstacles. Finally, abump detecting system 40 is provided although this is not illustrated inFIG. 1.

A user interface 42 is provided in order for a user to command the robot4 to start/stop a cleaning process, for example. The user interface 42is also shown generally in FIG. 1. The user interface 42 may takevarious forms, such as one or more mechanical buttons or even agraphical user interface with touch screen technology.

The controller 32 is also configured to supply drive signals to motors44 associated with the traction units 22 and also to receive odometrydata back from the traction units. For this purpose suitable rotationalsensing means 46 such as rotary encoders are provided on the motors 44.

Suitable power and control inputs are provided to suction motor 48 andagitator motor 50. Finally, a power input is provided to the controller32 from battery pack 52 and a charging interface 54 is provided by whichmeans the controller 32 can carry out charging of the battery pack 52when the battery supply voltage has dropped below a suitable threshold.It should be appreciated that the charging interface 54 is embodied bythe electrical charging contacts provided on the underside of the robot4, as described earlier.

The navigation sensor has been described briefly above as comprising anomnidirectional sensor 36. In more detail, and with reference also toFIG. 4, the navigation sensor 36 includes a panoramic annular lens 56that is optically coupled to a focusing system 58 and a digital imagesensor 60, for example a charge coupled device (CCD), as would befamiliar to the skilled person. As shown in schematic form in FIG. 4 thepanoramic annular lens 56 comprises a monolithic lens having a curvedannular upper surface 62 and a curved annular lower surface 64. Theupper surface protrudes from the cover of the robot 4 and defines afield of view θ of approximately 45 degrees of elevation around theperimeter of the robot 4.

Light that is incident on the lens 56 refracts through the upper lenssurface 62, is reflected off the mirrored interior of the lower lenssurface 64 and, subsequently, the upper surface 62 and passes through anexit pupil 66 provided in the lower lens surface 62. The exiting lightis collimated by the focusing system onto the image sensor 60. As isshown, the resulting image 65 is an annular format but, to simplifyprocessing of the image by the controller 32, suitable control circuitryis provided to transform the annular image into a subsequent image 67that is in rectangular format. In this embodiment, the rectangular image67 has a resolution of 1024 by 128 pixels, although it should beappreciated that these values are provided by way of example.

Returning to the control system 30 in FIG. 3, the controller 32 includesa navigation control module 68 that is responsible for guiding the robot4 around a room to perform a cleaning function. The navigation controlmodule 68 receives the image data from the navigation sensor 36 and isoperable to locate itself within its surrounding environment and to runthrough a suitable cleaning pattern in order to vacuum the floorsurface. In a preferred scenario, the robot 4 begins an operationlocated on the docking station 6 at the side of a room whereby the robot4 will set its initial location on its internal map as its origin at 0,0coordinates in a global reference frame. The robot 4 then proceeds tonavigate around a room whilst cleaning whereby it returns to the dockingstation 6 at an appropriate time, for example when the charge level ofthe battery pack 52 is determined to be less than a predeterminedthreshold. The navigation control module 68 therefore implementssuitable localization and mapping functionality to enable the robot 4 tonavigate around a room and return to its original position which, inthis scenario, is the location of the docking station. The preciseworkings of the navigation control module 68 are not central to theinvention so further detail is not provided.

When returning the robot 4 to the docking station 6, the navigationcontrol module 68 aims to place the robot 4 in front of and as close tothe docking station 6 as possible. In practice, due to potential errorsin the system, the navigation control module is able to place the robot4 in front of the docking station allowing for an angular error, andwithin a predetermined maximum radius of the docking station, forexample within 400 mm to 600 mm. When this is achieved, control of therobot 4 is handed over to a docking control module 70, also provided asa functional part of the controller 32.

A memory module 71 is provided for storage of data generated and used bythe navigation control module 68 and the docking control module 70 aswell as for other tasks performed by the controller 32 which are notmentioned here. For example, the memory module 71 serves to storemapping data and route data generated and used by the navigation controlmodule 68. The specific type of memory form is not central to theinvention and will not be detailed here. Needless to say, however, thatthe memory module may be an appropriate on-board memory of thecontroller 32 and will have sufficient capacity and access speed forsuitable acceptable of the controller 32.

The goal of the docking control module 70 is to guide the robot 4 ontothe docking station 6 from its initial position within the predetermineddistance and angular of the docking station 6 as delivered by thenavigation control module 68. It achieves this by analyzing the imagedata to identify a pair of targets 73 provided on the docking stationand inferring from the image data suitable control inputs to thetraction units 22 to guide the robot 4 onto the docking station 6, aswill be described in further detail later.

The docking station 6 has been described in general terms above to placeit in a suitable context. In more detail, and with reference to FIG. 5,the docking station 6 comprises two major components: a base portion 72and a back portion 74 that is pivotable with respect to the base portion72 into a folded or ‘stowed’ state.

The docking station 6 is positionable by a user in a room and,typically, the user will choose to position the base portion 72 so thata rear edge of it is adjacent a wall, as is shown in FIG. 1. The baseportion 72 includes an elongate rear portion 76 and a platform 78 thatextends forwardly from the rear portion 76. The base portion 72 takesthe general form of a ‘T’ with the lateral bar of the T being theelongate rear portion 76 and the trunk of the ‘T’ being the forwardplatform 78. The platform 78 includes the electrical contact means 8 forestablishing an electrical coupling with the robot 4 when it is anacceptable position with respect to the docking station 6.

Here, the docking station 6 is shown such in an unfolded or ‘deployed’state such that the back portion 74 is oriented approximately at aright-angle to the base portion 64 so that the back portion 74 standssubstantially upright. It should be noted that the docking station 6 mayalso be placed into a folded or ‘stowed’ state in which the back portion74 pivots about the base portion 72 to lie generally flat against it.The back portion 74 is generally rectangular and substantially flat inthis embodiment, although it will be appreciated that this is notessential.

The pair of targets 73 is carried on the back portion 74 of the dockingstation 6 so they are in a highly visible display position for the robot4 when the docking station 6 is in a deployed state. The pair of targets73 comprise a first fiducial marker or target 80 positioned on a lefthand side of the back portion 74 and a second fiducial marker or target82 positioned on the right hand side of the back portion 74. In thisembodiment, the second target 82 is a mirror image of the first target80, taken about a vertical plane, and is aligned with the first target80 horizontally. Each of the targets 80, 82 comprises a monochrometwo-by-two grid or array of squares that are contrasting in the mannerof a chess or ‘checkers’ board. It is currently preferred for each ofthe targets 80, 82 to have essentially the same pattern since thissimplifies the implementation of the target tracking algorithmimplemented by the docking control module 70 and, in this embodiment,alternate elements of the grid are coloured black or white for maximumcontrast. However, each target could be provided with a differentpattern if desired and/or different colours if desired. For laterreference, each target has a centre point ‘C’ that is in the centre ofthe grid.

The precise form of the targets 80, 82 is not crucial: they may be inthe form of stickers or decals that are adhered onto the back portion 74or, alternatively, they may be suitable labels that are incorporatedinto the plastics material of the back portion 74 during the fabricationprocess, for example.

The docking control module 70 is operable to identify the targets 80, 82in the image data received from the navigation sensor 36 and todetermine guidance information from the relative positions of thetargets 80, 82 as they appear in the image. FIG. 6 is provided by way ofexplanation of this principle and shows a robot 4 in three positions P1,P2, P3 aligned laterally side-by-side in front of the docking station 6.The arrows on the front of the robots 4 in each position indicate their‘dead-ahead’ orientation. Image frames corresponding to each of thethree robot positions P1, P2 and P3 are also illustrated and, at thispoint, it should be mentioned that the scale of the docking station 6 inthe respective image frame is not necessarily accurate to real-worlddata, but is stylized somewhat in order to explain the principle ofoperation more clearly.

In position P1, the robot 4 is directly in front of and faces thedocking station 6. Referring firstly to the image frame P1, it will benoted that the docking station 6 is centred in the image and that eachof the targets 80, 82 is aligned horizontally. More specifically, giventhe assumption that the robot 4 is on the same ground plane as thedocking station, the pixel height of the centre points of each target80, 32 is substantially equal.

Turning to the second robot position P2, it will be noted that thedocking station 6 is still centred in the image since the robot isoriented such that its dead-ahead position is aligned with the dockingstation 6. However, because the robot position P2 is spaced laterally toone side of the docking station 6, the relative positions of the targets80, 82 are shifted in the image due to the change in visual perspective.More specifically, the right hand target 82 is in a lower position inthe image frame P1 compared to the left hand target 80. Expressedanother way, the pixel height H1 of the centre point of the left handtarget 80 is greater than the pixel height H2 of the centre point of theright hand target 82.

Comparing the third robot position P3 with the second robot position P2,it can be seen that the docking station 6 is still centred in the imageframe, but because of the change in visual perspective in this imageframe it is the left hand target 80 that is now in a lower position inthe image frame compared to the right hand target 82. Expressed anotherway, the pixel height H1 of the centre point of the left hand target 80is less than the pixel height H2 of the centre point of the right handtarget 82.

By analyzing the pixel heights of the centre points of the two targets,and knowing that the first and second targets 80, 82, are in apredetermined relative spacing so as to be horizontally aligned on thedisplay portion of the docking station 6, the docking control module 70can determine whether the robot is to the right or the left of thedocking station 6 and so can determine appropriate control signals forthe traction units 22 in order to align the robot 4 with the dockingstation. For example, in position P2 the pixel height H2 of the righthand target 82 is in a relatively lower position, so the docking controlmodule 70 can determine that it needs to move towards the right in orderto align itself between the targets 80, 82. Further by evaluating themagnitude of the difference in pixel heights H1, H2 between the twotargets, the docking control module 70 can infer information about howfar it needs to move laterally in order to align itself with the targets80, 82.

In all of the robot positions P1, P2 and P3 described above, the robot 4is oriented so that it faces the docking station 6 and, therefore, thedocking station 6 and targets 80, 82 appear in the centre of the imageframes. It will be appreciated, however, that if the robot 4 was notoriented in this way, then the docking station 6 would appear at adifferent lateral position in the image. The robot 4 may therefore inferits orientation relative to the docking station 6 from the lateralposition of the targets 80, 82 in the image.

A similar principle can be used by the docking control module 70 todetermine the distance between the robot 4 and the docking station 6.With reference now to FIG. 7, two alternative robot positions P1, P2 areshown in an aligned position, one behind the other, and oriented to facedirectly towards the docking station 6. As in FIG. 6, image framescorresponding to each robot position P1, P2 are also provided.

At position P1, the robot 4 is closer towards the docking station thanin position P2 and the docking station is centred in the image frame,each of the targets 80, 82 being aligned horizontally. Comparing thiswith the second position P2, it can be seen that in the image frame P2the docking station 6 is also aligned in the centre of the image frame,but that the two targets 80, 82 are closer to each other than in thefirst position P1. Expressed another way, the pixel width W2 between thecentre point of the left hand target 80 and the centre point of theright hand target 82 is less in the second position P2 than the pixelwidth W1 in the first position P1. Therefore, by analyzing the pixelwidths W1, W2 between the centre points of the two targets 80, 82, andknowing that the first and second targets 80, 82 are in a predeterminedrelative distance from one another, the docking control module 70 isable to infer information regarding the distance of the robot 4 from thedocking station 6.

The above discussion explains the principle by which the docking controlmodule 70 determines information about the direction and distance therobot 4 must move in order to be guided towards the docking station 6.By way of further explanation, a routine 99 implemented by the dockingcontrol module 70 during a docking procedure is shown in FIG. 8, andthis will now be described together with a worked example of a dockingprocedure with reference also to FIG. 9 that shows a movement patterntaken by a robot 4 during a docking procedure.

Referring to FIG. 8, the routine is initiated at step 100 when thenavigation control module 68 returns the robot 4 within an accessiblerange of the docking station 6 and passes drive control over to thedocking control module 70. The robot 4 therefore enters the dockingstate at step 102 following which the docking control module 70 performsa ‘target search’ at image acquisition step 104 by acquiring an imageframe from the navigation sensor 36 and searching the image frame forthe targets 80, 82.

To identify the presence of the targets 80, 82 in the image, it iscurrently preferred that the docking control module 70 implements a typeof accelerated segment test algorithm known as ‘FAST feature detector’that is tuned suitably to identify a pattern as set out in the targets80, 82, and such a feature detecting algorithm would be understood bythe skilled person. However, other feature detection algorithms areacceptable, as long as they are robust at identifying the target pair inan image frame, and preferably a relatively low resolution image as usedin this embodiment.

Moving on from image acquisition step 104, the routine junctures atdecision step 106 depending on whether the targets 80, 82 have beenidentified in the acquired image frame. Referring now to the workedexample in FIG. 9, it will be seen that the robot 4 is positioned to theleft of the docking station 6 and lies in zone ‘A’ which represents anarea within which the docking control module 70 cannot ‘see’ the targetsreliably. In this scenario, the routine enters a maneuvering step 108 inwhich the robot starts to perform a predetermined target searchmanoeuvre. In this embodiment, the robot 4 starts to spiral outwardsfrom its start point, although it should be appreciated that othermanoeuvring patterns could be acceptable. For example, the robot 4 couldbe programmed to move side-to-side in increasing steps.

Whilst the robot 4 is manoeuvring along its spiral ‘target search’ path,shown in FIG. 9 at 110, the routine 99 loops through steps 104, 106 and108 to acquire an image frame and determine where the targets 80, 82 arevisible in the image. Preferably, the routine loops through these stepsat approximately 5-10 Hz which currently is considered to strike abalance between maximizing the effectiveness of the target searchfunction whilst avoiding a high impact on processor overhead.

As can be seen in FIG. 9, the robot 4 travels along the spiral targetsearch path until it reaches position P1, within zone B, at which pointthe ‘target search’ function is able to identify the targets 80, 82 inthe image frame. The routine 99 therefore flows to decision step 112that establishes whether the targets 80, 82 are directly in front of therobot 4. It should be noted that Zone B is represented by an angularregion about the centreline of the docking station in which the targetsshould be visible by the robot. For present purposes, zone B has anangular range of approximately 45 degrees.

The orientation of the robot 4 is indicated by the arrow and at positionP1 it is oriented generally parallel to the docking station 6. Arepresentative image of position P1 is also shown in FIG. 9 and it canbe seen that the docking station 6 lies towards the left hand side ofthe image frame since the robot 4 travelling direction is not alignedwith the targets 80, 82. Due to the position of the targets 80, 82 inthe image frame at position P1, the decision step 112 is negative and sothe routine proceeds to step 114 which causes the robot 4 to rotate toalign it with the targets 80, 82. The routine then loops through steps104 to 112 until the robot 4 is aligned with the docking station 6. Atthis point in the discussion, it should be appreciated that the dockingstation 6 has, in effect, moved relative to the image frame so as to becentred therein, although its visual perspective has not changed.

Once the targets 80, 82 are directly in front of the robot 4, theroutine passes to step 116 at which it is determined whether the centrepoints C of the each target 80, 82 are substantially aligned in theimage. To accomplish this, the docking control module 70 analyses thedifference in height between the centre points of each target 80, 82that it has acquired in the most recent image, as described earlier withreference to FIG. 6. In the FIG. 9 example, at position P1 the visualperspective of the docking station 6 means that the left hand sidetarget 80 is at a higher position in the image compared to the righthand side target 82. Therefore, decision step 116 is answered negativelyand the process flow passes to decision step 118 where it is establishedwhether the docking station 6 is too distant. To accomplish this, thedocking control module 70 compares the pixel distance W between thecentre points of the targets 80, 82 in the image (hereinafter the‘target pixel separation’) and compares this value to a predeterminedvalue that is set to demarcate an acceptable distance that the robot 4may be from the docking station 6 before starting its ‘docking run’. Ineffect, therefore, the predetermined target pixel separation establisheszone C which is considered to be an ideal distance zone for the robot 4to be from the docking station 6 in order to prepare for a successfuldocking run. The overall aim of the docking control module 70 is toposition the robot 4 in zone C in order to prepare the robot 4 for adocking run.

In the example of FIG. 9, the robot 4 is beyond zone C, but in theangular range of zone B, causing decision step 118 is answeredpositively and so process flow passes to step 120 at which the robot 4is caused to move forwards. Following this the routine checks thecharging system on the robot 4 to determine whether a charge has beendetected at step 122, answered negatively in this example, whereby theprocess loops back to the image acquisition and target search step 104.Since the targets 80, 82 are visible to the robot 4, and since the robot4 is aligned with the target 80, 82, the process loops back throughsteps 118, 120 and 122 until it is no longer determined that the targets80, 82 are too far away. Expressed another way, the ‘move forward’action will continue until the docking control module 70 determines thatthe target pixel separation is greater than or equal to a predeterminedminimum value. The robot 4 has therefore arrived at position P2illustrated on FIG. 9.

Now in the position P2, the process loops through steps 102 to 118, asexplained above, but the decision step 118 is now answered negativelyand the process flow moves to a further decision step 124. In a similarmanner to step 118, at step 124 the docking control module 70 analysesthe target pixel separation and determines whether it exceeds apredetermined maximum value, which establishes the inner boundary 125 ofzone C and, in doing so, the docking control module 70 determineswhether the robot is still in zone C and is not too close to the dockingstation 6. In the event that the robot 4 travelled out of zone C so asto be too close to the docking station 6, the decision step 124 would beanswered negatively and step 127 would cause the robot 4 to execute areverse manoeuvre until the robot 4 is positioned into zone C.

Since at position P2 the robot 4 is still in zone C, step 124 isanswered negatively so that the process flow passes to step 126. Step126 is a manoeuvring step and the docking control module 70 analyses therelative pixel heights of the centre points of the two targets asexplained above with reference to FIG. 6, and commands the robot 4 totraverse across zone C for a predetermined distance in the direction ofthe lowest target, which in this case is the right hand target 82. Thepredetermined distance may be either a fixed value or, preferably, maybe linked to the misalignment of the targets. For example, the greaterthe misalignment of the targets, the greater distance the robottraverses through zone C, although it may be preferable for the robot totake the traversal in relatively small steps in order to preventovershoot. Once the robot 4 has completed its traversal movement, itrotates once again to align itself with the targets. The reason for thisis to guard against the effects of the robot pitching forward orbackwards during movement which may cause the targets to be ‘tilted’ ifthey are not viewed from directly in front.

This manoeuvre is illustrated in FIG. 9 in which the robot 4 traversesfrom position P2 to position P3. During this manoeuvre, the routineloops through steps 104 to 126 until the two targets 80, 82 becomesubstantially aligned horizontally in the image, such that the robot 4now resides in zone ‘D’ at position P3.

At position P3, the targets are aligned horizontally, as is shown in thecorresponding image frame but it will be appreciated that the targets80, 82 are not aligned directly in front of the robot 4 since thedocking station 6 is off to the left hand side of the image frame. Theprocess flow therefore loops through steps 112 and 114 in order to alignthe targets 80, 82 in the image frame and to reach position P4.

At position P4, the robot 4 has been manoeuvred into an ideal positionto conduct a ‘docking run’ onto the docking station because it is in themiddle of zone D and is aligned directly with the docking station 6.Accordingly, the process continues through steps 112 and 116 to step 120at which the robot 4 is commanded to move forwards. The processcontinues through the charge detection step 122 and continues around theloop until this decision step 122 can be answered positively, which iswhen the robot 4 has successfully manoeuvred itself onto the dockingstation 6 so as to engage the electrical contact means 8. When chargehas been detected at step 122, the routine continues to step 128 atwhich point the docking procedure is considered complete and the dockingcontrol module 70 places the robot into a standby mode during arecharging process.

From the above explanation, it will be appreciated that the dockingcontrol module 70 is effective at guiding the robot 4 from a range ofpositions in the proximity of the docking station 6 to arrive at thedocking station 6 in order to establish electrical contact with thecharging contacts 8. Advantageously, the docking control module 70operates in a heuristic manner and the analysis of the relativepositions of the targets 80, 82 in the image frame to infer guidanceinformation avoids complex geometrical calculations that may impose aheavy processing burden on the system and which may be more heavilyaffected from noise within the visual sensing system. Of course, it isnot essential that the robot 4 be charged at the docking station 6 andit may be necessary for the robot to dock for another purpose. Forexample, the docking station 6 may be provided with a vacuum systemwhich is engageable with the robot in order to empty the dirt from theseparation system without needing intervention by a user.

The robot 4 has been described as having an omnidirectional visionsystem and such a system is useful in mobile robotic applications sinceit provides an all-round view of the robot environment. However, theinvention is not limited to being used with an omnidirectional visionsystem. For example, the robot 4 may instead be provided with amonocular camera oriented in the dead-ahead position and, in such aconfiguration, the target search function would require the robot 4 alsoto rotate in order to capture an all-round view of its environment.Although such a process would be more time consuming, and marginallymore computationally complex, it would still be feasible.

Furthermore the invention is not limited to the form of docking stationdescribed here and is applicable to a docking station of any shape.However, the important factor is that the docking station should haveappropriate display surfaces so as to be able to present a target pairin an upright orientation so that they can be image captured by therobot.

Although a pair of targets have been described, the invention is alsoapplicable to more than two targets.

Whilst the robot 4 has been described above as a vacuum cleaning robot,it will be appreciated that this is merely to put the invention into asuitable context. In fact, the invention is applicable to other mobilerobotic applications or, indeed, any autonomous vehicle, which needs arobot/vehicle to dock with a docking station. For examplesecurity/maintenance robots may need to return to a docking station torecharge or to pick up tools, and lunar rovers may need to dock with astation in order to deposit collected soil samples. In addition, a semi-or fully-autonomous electric passenger vehicle may need to be able todock with a socking station in order to engage a charging point. Mostusefully, perhaps, the invention may be applied to mobile roboticdomestic surface treating appliances such as autonomous vacuum cleaners,lawn mowers, floor surface polishers, to name a few examples.

1. A docking station for an autonomous vehicle, the docking stationcomprising a main body having a first fiducial marker and a secondfiducial marker spaced a predetermined distance from the first fiducialmarker.
 2. The docking station of claim 1, wherein the first fiducialmarker and the second fiducial marker are located on a display portionof the docking station that is in a substantially upright orientationwhen the docking station is placed on a floor surface.
 3. The dockingstation of claim 2, wherein the display portion of the docking stationis planar.
 4. The docking station of claim 2, wherein the displayportion is pivotable with respect to a base portion of the dockingstation.
 5. The docking station of claim 2, wherein each of the firstand second fiducial markers defines a pattern, and wherein the patternof the first fiducial marker is the same as the pattern of the secondfiducial marker.
 6. The docking station of claim 2, wherein each of thefirst and second fiducial markers defines a pattern, and wherein thepattern of the first fiducial marker is the mirror image of the patternof the second fiducial marker.
 7. The docking station of claim 5,wherein the pattern is a grid comprising four squares in a two-by-twoarrangement, wherein alternate squares in the grid are contrastingcolors.